click map AirPigz About mail Robert Clupper

click map 787 Caption Contest CoolPix Homebuilt Military Must See Oshkosh Racing RC Space Video Podcast

click map Perfect Paper Airplane Facebook twitter

Search AirPigz...
Popular Previous Posts


  

  

 

Search AirPigz 1000+ posts

 

Friday
Mar122010

Clear The Streets For The Winner of Caption Contest #33!

 The voters have spoken and @adamcanfly has cleverly produced the winning caption - great job!  I wondered if anyone would find a way to incorporate the name of the aircraft (Maule) into this caption, which is actually a snapshot from the 1981 movie Cannonball Run.  

 Adam has been a fan of AirPigz for a long time, but he's also been a unique technical supporter of my quest for AvGeek World Domination... I'm glad to see him snag a win : )

 Unless I go weird and change my mind, we'll plan for another caption contest starting this next Monday morning.  Til then, please be careful crossing the street!

 

Thursday
Mar112010

Fascinating 1959 Farnborough Video: A Brave New World! 

 I’ve purposely posted part 2 of this video first cuz it has the most flying action, and it’s some pretty amazing flying action at that!  After a glimpse of a unique hovercraft, we see the fabulous, tailless, Avro Vulcan bomber take off.  But even more important to me is just how close some of the people are to the flying going on.  This was a fantastic era, one I wish very much that we stilled lived in today.  When that Vulcan takes off, there are about 20 people, probably associated with the event, standing in the grass along the runway… one guy about 20 feet from the edge of the runway! 

 You’ll see several other places with people close to the runways, but there’s also clear views of the jets flying right over the huge crowds.  I know some people will strongly disagree with me, but I think the risks are totally worth the vastly improved experience seeing, hearing, and feeling these airplanes so close.  We live in an era now that tries to remove all the risks from living.  But the truth is you can’t, and we never will be able to. 

 I think societies are much stronger when we acknowledge the risks, and then face them straight on, with boldness and courage.  We also have a ton more fun that way too!  Anyway, it’s remarkable to see the contrast to the way things are done today.

 Other extremely notable footage in the video are of airplanes like the Vickers Vanguard; the Argosy freighter; the ultra-cool hybrid rotorcraft Fairey Rotodyne; the first ever British VTOL jet, the experimental Shorts SC.1; and some great views of the Black Arrows aerobatic team flying 16 Hawker Hunters in close formation!  What an incredible history lesson in this 7 minute video of what appeared to be a brave new world coming over the horizon.

 Part 1 of the video below is also great to see, but doesn’t have as much overall action.  There is a lot of footage of the de Havilland Comet tho, very cool stuff to see.  It’s also interesting to see the strength of the British aerospace industry at the time.  It's a great video history lesson : )

 

 

Thursday
Mar112010

Fresh And Fun RCPowers Video: More Cool Tailless RC Experimenting 

 

Wednesday
Mar102010

Never Ever Let Your 11 Year Old Prop Your Airplane! 

 And I say again, never ever let your 11 year old prop your airplane.  OK, now that I have the disclaimer out of the way, I’ll tell you that’s me as an 11 year old propping the first Breezy we had back in 1972.  I decided to put these pics up because of the recent flap with the controller’s kids relaying instructions to crews of several active airliners back in February.  Here’s another thing to be clear on: I’m not saying it was a good idea for the controller to allow his kids to relay instructions, but after careful review of the audio, I’m not gonna say it was a horrible idea either.

 This is really such a complicated issue to make perfect logical sense out of, especially in our current culture, which I think is just one slippery finger away from losing its grip.  Of course, letting your kids do your work as a controller isn’t the best idea in the world, but fundamentally, I’d far prefer a controller with a good head on his shoulders allow this, than to have a controller with a bad head on his shoulders quietly working his way thru the system.

 I think the biggest problem in all of this is that both the media and the general public have no idea at all what goes on inside a control tower or any other facility where controllers are doing their work.  I’ve been in several different facilities over the years, and the reality is that it’s pretty much nothing like you think it is before you’ve seen it.  And anyone who’s talked to controllers over the radios in high traffic environments, or even just listened along, knows that it sometimes sounds like a foreign language with the way instructions and responses are tossed about in rapid fire and somewhat garbled fashion.  I’m pretty sure the public perception of how the system works is very far from the reality.

 With this in mind, the controller's kids did an excellent job… an A+ plus job in my mind.  Plus, all they were doing was relaying instructions.  At no time were the lives of anyone in any of those airplanes in the hands of those kids.  In my opinion, for the media to suggest such a thing just further shows me that they are completely clueless.  The really scary part is that at least 90% of the aviation related stories I see in the news media are significantly inaccurate.  If they get aviation wrong, why would we honestly think they're really getting anything right?  Anything.

 My dad spent 35 years flying with United Airlines, and I was raised around that environment.  When those pics of me propping the Breezy were taken, he had recently started flying United’s new 747’s.  He knew how to deal with responsibility, and lots of it.  He also knew I had the basic knowledge necessary to understand both the procedure of propping an airplane, and the risks of it.  He knew I was just big enough to be able to handle the task physically, and, after teaching me how, he had reason the believe I would be able to accomplish the task, and do so well.  I propped that 90hp Continental a lot as an 11 and 12 year old and never had even one problem doing it safely.  And, if I may add, by the age of 13, I was completely competent as a pilot (not licensed of course) in the Citabria 7KCAB that we had.  That's a 13 year old able to handle cross winds in a 150hp taildragger on a really narrow Elgin, Illinois runway.  It's not because I'm special, but because I was fairly mature, and had the right opportunities with the right education and supervision. 

 I know that my story isn’t really apples to apples with the controller’s kids story, but I do think there’s some common ground here.  Young people who have the knowledge needed, who can also be seen to understand the task and the risk, and are taught well and effectively supervised, simply have no trouble doing something that most people would say they couldn't do.

 The controller in question, and apparently his supervisor, are very possibly going to lose their jobs over this.  In my simple, been-propping-airplanes-since-I-was-11-years-old mind, that’s the real tragedy here.

 

Tuesday
Mar092010

2010 Red Bull Air Race Season Starts March 26-27 In Abu Dhabi 

Michael Goulian in the race he won at Budapest in 2009

 Winter is finally winding down, and the Red Bull Air Races are definitely winding up for another big year!  The first race of the season is coming soon with qualifying on Friday, March 26, and then the races on Saturday, March 27 in Abu Dhabi, UAE.  This is the 6th straight year that the races have included Abu Dhabi.

 If you haven’t already, then right now is a perfect time to go to RedBullAirRace.com and get your head into what will be going on this year at the races.  I know I’m planning to keep a close eye on all 8 races scheduled so far for 2010.  I was able to catch the 2009 Budapest race via the live webcast, and it was by far the most impressive event, and event production I’ve ever seen in a webcast.  I’m still working to confirm if the Abu Dhabi race will be covered live online, but if it is, I’ll be up early Saturday, March 27 to watch the guys tear up the sky.  You should too : )

 

 

Tuesday
Mar092010

This Is What The 1966 Cessna 150 Should Have Looked Like!

 The recent post with the cool retro ad for the 1966 Cessna 150 has stirred up a lot of thoughts for me concerning the direction general aviation aircraft have taken over the last 50 years.  I admit I’m extremely old-school when it comes to aircraft design, but that doesn't mean I’m old-fashioned.  It has a lot more to do with the idea that an airplane should be designed in such a way that it stirs you emotionally.  Great design means the airplane is certainly gonna perform as desired, that’s a must, but it should also do more than just move your body from point A to point B… it should move you on the inside too.

 Having said all that, this beautiful airplane pictured here is what I wish Cessna would have done for the 1966 150.  In my little fantasy world, this would have all happened after they had finally come to the realization that ‘progress’ was killing their little 2 seat airplane.  What is pictured here is really a 1959 150 that was converted to a taildragger and then given a gorgeous paint job reminiscent of a classic Cessna 180 scheme.  The work was done by the good people at TaildraggerAviation, and it’s pretty obvious to me that these people think like I do.

 The transformation from a rather dumpy tri-gear putt putt to a lean looking and proud taildragger worthy of the coolest aviators is pretty amazing.  I look at this picture and I think: I’d love to have one of those!  And I can tell ya, I have never ever ‘wanted’ a Cessna 150 before, but they way this one looks changes all my thinking.

 I would have been so pleased if Cessna had realized that the ’66 150 really needed to be a taildragger, for the good of aviation.  I’m not suggesting that ALL airplanes drag their tail, but I would suggest that ALL students should learn from day one in a taildragger.  It forces you to be a better pilot, and better pilots make the whole world of aviation a better place. 

 Lastly, I wish in 2006, 40 years after the 1966 150 introduced the swept tail and electric flaps, that Cessna would have jumped the tracks that lead to the Skycatcher and instead would have taken the bold step to re-introduce the 150 as it looks here.  Resurrecting the old type certificate could have saved loads of money over starting from scratch, and since they wound up using the O-200 engine in the Skycatcher anyway, they could have skipped the LSA idea and made an airplane with real utility and buckets full of curb appeal.  Oh, and maybe then they could have seen fit to build it in the U.S. too instead of China.

 If you really wanna see what I think the modern 2 seater ought to look like, check out my DreamBird.  I originally drew it with the 110hp Rotec radial in mind, but it would be even more fun with the 150hp : )

 

Monday
Mar082010

Caption Contest #33 - Jaywalkers Beware! Ends Wednesday 3.10.10 At 9PM EST

 Hey, it’s our first Caption Contest that also includes a video clip!  That way I can prove I know what I’m talking about when I say that this image actually comes from a movie.  It was a stunt performed for the 1981 movie Cannonball Run, and the video below shows it was pretty adventurous.   

 You can use the context of the movie or come up with an entirely different idea, but either way you’ve got til Wednesday evening at 9pm EST to submit funny captions, then I’ll pick the best 5 and put ’em in a poll for everyone to vote on.  The most popular caption will put the winner in line for $20 in AirPigz funny money

 The Rules:

1) Max of 3 submissions per person

2) Submissions go in the 'comments' area 

3) Game ends Wednesday at 9pm EST 

4) Keep it clean!

 Anyone who wants to cast their vote will be able to after the poll goes up around an hour after the 9pm Wednesday submission deadline.

 We'll vote for 24 hours, til 9pm EST on Thursday.  The winner will be posted  Friday morning 3-12-10.  Jaywalkers beware!

 

 

Sunday
Mar072010

CoolPix - Modern Military: Holy Smoke! B-47 Stratojet JATO Takeoff 

(click pic for hi-res)

 This amazing entry in the CoolPix collection helps to set the line between ‘Vintage Military’ and ‘Modern Military’.  I’ve decided we’ll make the break at the end of WWII.  This also fits pretty well since that’s basically the time period where we entered the jet age as well.

 This pic is from 1954 of a Boeing B-47 making a Jet Assisted Take Off (JATO).  The rather massive JATO package was a great help in getting the aircraft off the ground a lot quicker than with just the 6 wing mounted jet engines.  Tho the airplane was fast, with a cruising speed of about 550mph, the jet engine technology of the time didn’t make good thrust at slow speeds.  JATO was a good solution to this issue at the time.  It’s really interesting to see this huge amount of smoke pouring out of the rockets, as well as a lot coming the 6 jets too.  Early jet engines were also well known for making a lot of smoke!

 It’s also very cool to see 3(!) B-36’s in the background.  This is truly a fascinating picture.  The original picture on the internet has several cracks in the photo paper and other blemishes.  I’ve photoshopped those out and made a near perfect pic here for you to enjoy : )    

 Seems like the Boeing B-47 Stratojet is often forgotten in history, at least compared to how much of a quantum leap the airplane was.  First flight took place in December 1947, a little over 2 years after the end of World War 2.  The distance in design philosophy from an airplane like the B-29 to the B-47 is pretty staggering.  The key elements being the swept wing and the jet engines.  The other aircraft in the running for the US Military contract for a long range jet bomber were all configured with a straight wing.  The B-47 concept also began with a straight wing, but as development continued, Boeing engineers turned to German information gained after the war on swept wing technology.  Boeing committed to the swept wing (35 degrees on the B-47), and at that point, one of the most important elements to usher in a successful jet age, both military and civilian, was defined.

 Here are a few other interesting pieces of info on the B-47:

 It was thought that the wing would have to be thin to achieve high speeds, thus the fuel was carried in the fuselage, or in underwing external tanks.  Fuel location had to be managed carefully to keep the center of gravity in the proper position.

 The design was so aerodynamically clean, and early jet engines were so slow to spool up, that a drogue chute was utilized in flight during the landing phase to create drag.  This allowed the engines to carry some power in the event of a missed approach while also allowing a steeper approach angle without excessive speed.

 The airplane had a high wing loading which resulted in a pretty high approach and touchdown speed.  A second, larger parachute was installed to deploy after touchdown to help slow the airplane.  Thrust reversers hadn’t been invented yet.

 

Saturday
Mar062010

Burt Rutan And Model Airplanes At AMA Expo 2010

 This video is a little over 45 minutes long, but if you have a real interest in model airplanes, airplane design, or any of the work Burt Rutan has done over the last 40 years, then I suggest you carve out some time and soak this up.  It's that good.

 It's Burt talking at the Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA) Expo 2010 back in January.  It's a great insight into what a big role model airplanes have played in Burt's life (and career), and it showcases one of the things that make Burt so cool... he's just a real person with a cracked sense of humor and a real passion for flying machines.

 It's also good timing since I'll have my own video up soon of Burt from Oshkosh in 1984 when he and his brother Dick introduced the Voyager to the world.  Check back soon : )

 

Friday
Mar052010

CoolPix - Advertising: 1966 Cessna 150 - Includes A Back Seat!

(click pic for hi-res) 

I didn’t even know a CoolPix category titled ‘advertising’ existed til last night!  That’s when I stumbled upon this awesome 2 page Cessna ad that ran in April 1966 for the ‘new and improved’ 150.  I photographed it and then cleaned it up in photoshop a bit, but I promise that none of the content or intent of it has been changed.  You gotta read this ad text!

 It’s hard to believe this ad is now 44 years old, and if I may say, it’s even harder to believe that having a back seat in a 150 for anything more than a pet hamster makes much sense!  However, I did a little research and have decided that the useful load for a 1966 150F with a backseat installed would likely be a tiny tad north of 500 pounds.  If you figure a 1966 dad at 180 pounds (dressed) and a mom at 130 (she’s dressed too), plus 40 for those suitcases, and then a cumulative total of 75 for the two rug rats… that’s gonna realistically leave about 12 gallons of go juice for some jolly but some cramped aviatin’... "are we there yet?!"  I guess that all works out to ’doable’, but I’m thinking that with a big load of bugs on the leading edges, a hot and humid day with the #2 cylinder a little softer than you really want, you’re most likely just gonna put the slug in sluggish : )  Flash forward to American sized people in 2010: fuhgettaboutit!

 Even tho I’ve got a chunk of hours in a 150/152, I must admit that I never knew they offered up a backseat option.  Hmm, maybe it didn’t really prove all that useful in the long run?  Either way, it’s extremely cool to see this retro ad with it so clearly on display.  It's also neat to realize that 1966 was a big year for the 150.  The ’racier’, ’Flight/Sweep’ tail (that’s a quote from the ad) was brand new, and they also introduced, as an option, the ’needle point’ spinner!  The doors were enlarged 23%, and according to the text, the interiors were more ’luxurious’.  Hmm.  The ’Para-Lift’ flaps were also now electrically operated.

 They also indicate that the ’Land-O-Matic’ wide tracking landing gear has been retained, but I don’t see any mention that the airplane is also apparently available without wing struts.  Look at the cabin pic, notice the fab 4 eagerly approaching their aviatory device, observe that the door is swung very wide open… and the wing strut is just nowhere to be found.  ‘Truth in advertising’ hadn’t been invented yet!  Campbell's with their ‘soup and marbles’ were yet to come (1968).

 I make fun, but I really love all this.  The ad with its 60’s graphic style, full of hyperbole and weird names for design features.  And the Cessna 150, it really is a big part of aviation history.  You might say that the $6,995 selling price is part of history too.  I’d like to know how that computes against today’s wages.  Sure sounds like a heck of a deal.  It did go over well, as that was actually a price cut of over 10% from the previous year.  In 1966, Cessna made more 150’s than any other year: 3,087.

 I actually have a lot more to say about the Cessna 150, but I’m saving that for another post coming up soon.  Until then, I hope you get as big a kick out of this ad from the past as I did!